By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin on 12 November 2012
Edit Thread
Jay520 said:
Mr Khan said:

DanneSandin illustrated it better. Bananaking is being deliberately obtuse. He could have said "i thought LBP was better," and then this thread would be half as long, if that.


I don't understand that. Why should people have to confirm that their opinion is....their opinion. If someone says blue is better than red, then it's obviously known that they're not speaking objectively, they're giving their opinion. If you give a statement that's obviously subjective, then it's pretty redundant to have to say "imo" or "i think."

But really though, my problem is really with the way he was responded to earlier in this thread. I don't have a problem with the debate honestly, no matter how silly I think it is; it's moreso his treatment in the first few pages that struck a nerve with me.

It's when he said (paraphrased) that a higher metacritic score makes LBP an objectively better game than NSMB that led to it imho.

 

I like what you're trying to do, but I'm also happy people reacted to a claim like that. And I'll also agree with Bananaking that sales =/= quality. That is a fact, as many games of lesser quality have sold better than games that have taken years to make. Sales is a measure of popularity, not quality. If a president is elected, does that make him the best? No, it makes him the most popular.