By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Player1x3 said:
curl-6 said:
Player1x3 said:
curl-6 said:
Player1x3 said:
curl-6 said:

See my post here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4876493

For a Microsoft comparison, I haven't played Halo 4 yet, but that aside only Forza 3 & 4 approach the tier of games like Mario Galaxy.


So you were only going by your opinion ?

Wii having best 1st party is an opinion. It's having the weakest 3rd party is a fact

There are no facts when it comes to game quality, everything is an opinion.


No, actually quality isn't subjective. I can not like a certain game but i can still admit it has quality and recognize it as such

But your admission that it's quality even if you don't like it is still made through the lens of your own perception. We can never be truly objective because we cannot escape our own heads. 


No, quality can be distinguished regardless of your own taste and preference

There is no universally agreed upon set of criteria for a quality game though, so true objectivity is impossible. 

Again, even when you try to step outside your own personal likes and dislikes, your assessment is still bound by the way you interpret the world. It's like this: say you're looking at something through different pairs of reading glasses; even if you wear none, you eyes are still a lens in themselves, from which you cannot escape.


There actually is an objective critera that make a quality game, regardless of tase. Polishness, free of technical problems, satisfactory content and a good user interface just to name a few. You wont tell me there is anyone that hates these things. This is something that all quality games should have. Fun is subjective, quality isn't