GameOver22 said:
Exit Polls (rep 2008-32%; rep 2012-32%) (ind 2008-34%; ind 2009-34%) (dem 2008-39%; dem 2012-38%)-this is national level Yeah, I'm actually not seeing much to support the article's claim. If you look at the state exit polls, the numbers seem to be pretty consistent between 2008 and 2012 as well. I'm just not seeing this movement from the republican party to the independent category. There actually seems to be a pretty big swing for how the independents voted as well (+8 Obama in 2008; -5 Obama in 2012). My guess, there are more indendents that lean republican this time around, but they didn't come from the republican party....this would match up with Obama's smaller popular vote victory as well. Edit: Main point: Obama won because there are more democratic identifiers...not because of a movement from the republican to the independent category. |
Even that though is remotely shocking though. The pollsters models are either or for some reason self identified Republicans didn't go to the polls.
Example
Which is strange... all I can imagine is that it has to do with the demographic changes in the electoral college. It used to be that Democrats were always disadvantaged by it because they got less credit for their densley packed liberal states... however things have swung in their favor as can be seen by the population/electoral swing.
For said polls to be true, and pretty much every self identification poll had this, you'd have to assume this occured in "safe" states. Either Republican or Democrat.