| runqvist said: Editing your post was interesting... I get 1ms almost all the time with pinging my router from the same room, 1-3ms from next room and 1-54(lol) from third room. That has been the case always, but when I play a game online, my ping is 20ms higher than on my wired connection. That is with my laptop on the same room and playing on the same server with ethernet connection. It isn't just about online gaming, it is also about downloading games from internet and in few years maybe streaming 4k movies. How much bandwith would a decent quality 4k stream take? Funny, I don't feel that my bandwith is going to waste but if you say so... |
So the problem is the location of your router rather than Wi-Fi itself. And how does your ping go from 1ms to X + 20ms (your ethernet connection plus 20ms) when gaming online? how are you gettign an extra 20 ms in latency when gaming compared to a direct ping? You've got some other kind of delay thing going on somehow.
And this entire debate is about online gaming. Not downloading. Downloading via Wi-Fi should have practically zero perceptible difference over a wired connection. And we won't have 4k streams for a very long time. If you think Wi-Fi tech will remain at current latency levels then you've ignored the advancements of the tech over the just the past 4-5 years. Not to mention that any streaming will have buffering making latency a moot point anyway (unless it's just absolutely horrible which would not be the fault of the Wi-Fi tech itself).
For online gaming, it's a waste. You'd have absolutely no difference in online gaming expirience with a 15 Mb connect. Provided your latency is still the same which it should be given that latency is independent of bandwidth speed. For downloading though...jealous by thy name.
The rEVOLution is not being televised
