CGI-Quality said:
Hynad said:
CGI-Quality said:
Hynad said:
Ah, don't worry. I don't really care what you think. I just wanted to point out your change of speech and position. Of course, since you have never admitted to being wrong when called out on something, I didn't expect more than what you replied. ^_-
|
It's never a good idea to claim "x" individual has done something and then have zero to back it up. This isn't the first time you've pulled this either, but it's, again, of no consequence.
|
What, you want me to look at your post history and post links to the comments you made when, back then, people with your newly found enthusiasm for PC tech would come in threads about Console graphics being the greatest (Like Killzone 2, God of War 3 and Uncharted 2) and you'D argue that artstyle, design and even engine tricks would make you say that they still had a shot? Hum... Sorry, I know you remember those times. So no, I'm not going to waste my time going through your post history just to pinpoint what I know you remember full well. You may have found a new bias, but I don't think it made you stupid.
|
You're making some fairly bold claims there, and not a single shred of proof. While I certainly did argue for those console titles, against PC, I have never said any console game looked better than the best from it (which was the argument in here). You say I don't "admit to being wrong", yet show me nothing to prove that I said one thing then and something different now. It's on you to provide, not I.
Anyway, if you'd like to continue this conversation, the walls work. No need to destroy the thread because of some personal distaste you have.
|
Nope. People brought tech into the mix, and you'd argue that tech alone isn't what makes a game beautiful or not. Your argument was basically the same as saying someone may find beauty in a shiny rock still in its raw form, while some will see beauty in its crafted form, like a perfected diamond.
I remember well. I was backing you back then.
