The thing I don't get too is... practically every very liberal person I know isn't a fan of Obama, but thinks Romney will be worse.
Barak Obama is killing children and American citizens overseas... with not a very good reason why... and in 2009-2010 when it was a majority of democrats and they had all the legislative power in the world.....
93% of all created wealth was captured by the top 1%. In large part to Obama vetoing a deal between the leaving Bush administration and senate democrats to write language into TARP that would force banks to write down bad mortgages for poorer people.
How much worse could Romney actually be in these regards?
The areas he's supposed to be worse in... are already areas that Obama is really really really horrible in.
Like worse then George W Bush horrible.
Bush's drone policy was actually smaller and more reserved and his 1% number was like... 64-65% when he had growth. (1% had like 55% of the loses when bad.).
I don't see why you'd vote for either mainstream candidate, but at least Republicans are being ideologically consistant.
How a liberal doesn't vote 3rd party I have no idea.
