Halo 4 gets a 20/100 on Meta, proves eview system is broken.

[Wh1pL4shL1ve_007]

Veknoid_Outcast said:

Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:

bananaking21 said:

Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:

bananaking21 said:
i know people are upset at the score and all, and from what i seen no way halo 4 is a 2 out of 10. but just because one person thinks so doesnt mean we have to ban the site from metacritic. honestly if we keep doing so reviews will mean nothing in the future because all we will get are high review scores for our favorite franchises no matter how bad or good the game really is

No..its not all about the score BUT the content of their review. 

Im tired at getting angry at EGM, Quarter to three and gamearena. Im just gonna go play halo. 

well its just one review, it really doesnt matter much and thats the hole point of metacritic, to not depends on one review but all of them and give an idea of how reviews see the game in a general sense. now would i agree with the review? most probably not. but at the end it doesnt really matter, it wont affect the overall score very much

90 to 89 to 88 to 87. 

As a Halo fan, this bothers me very much. Im sure you will be too with the game you love (whatever it is).

It bothers me because I predicted 91 in the Halo 4 review thread :) Oh well, can't win them all.

But why are so concerned about the aggregate score? As long as the game is available to you, and as long as you get enjoyment out of it, why do you care about whether Metacritic reads 90 or 87?

I dont know.  

Probably because I know that halo 4 deserves so much more. But I havent played the game yet so I could be wrong.