F0X said:
oniyide said:
F0X said:
happydolphin said:
| oniyide said:
Ive never even heard of those terms, but i still wager that even those people know about what is better. Look at a screenshot for a wii game then look at the HD version of the same guy, almost night and day in each instance, if this were true why didnt Wii versions of games do as well as HDs if the true hobbyists is such a small number?
|
Read FOX's comments on Forgotten Sands though, apparently the Wii version was the best in that case. It's a case by case thing, not because one looks prettier that the game is better, come on now, it's not necessarily the case.
|
I'm okay with "it's the exception that proves the rule" argument.
Or the "core gamers only care about graphics so hah!" argument.
Honestly the only reason why I'm here is because I don't get to talk about The Forgotten Sands enough. Apparently I've been the only one who cares... even among the Wii owners!
|
you know no one cares when the PSP version sold more, something aint right with that
|
I know, right? It had a meta of 65, too. It's terrible. I don't even know how it sold so much... wasn't the PSP dead in the West back in 2010?
|
The only logical explanation is that there is a bigger fanbase for PoP on PSP than their is on Wii. Im not trying to start crap, i cant think of another reason its not like the PSP version even had previews or any kind of attention at all. Or maybe it was that much cheaper anyone got a better explanation I would love to hear it.