By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ikol said:
small44 said:
DemoniOtaku said:
SunofKratos said:
Well i am not a fan of the Assassins Creed Series ( part 1 was boring inb my eyes) but i haver bought now Assassins Creed 3 and Assassind Creed Vita. And with that said i can undertsnad that just some reviewers give the game lower scores because if can not match the quality of Assassind Creed 3.

But the real question is should Assassind Creed Vita be compared with Assassins Creed 3?Reviewers seems to forget that it is a mobile game. The problem the vita has right now is that there games will always be compered with there console counterparts instead of seeing it as a mobile experience. You guys can blame Sony for tghat because they made an handheld with such beautiful and stunning graphics that reviewers automatically think they played PS3 games.


Even Ragnarok was compared to Monster Hunter.. but it say that is boring and repetitive because the grinding.. the same thing that make Monster Hunter a great game.. I don't like to compare games even on the same genre.. each game should be judge by it self.. was fun? No ok is bad for you... Is like compare Gravity Rush with infamous.. open wolrd, super owers, strange people arround you and a fallin world (more literally on gravity XD).. Would be fair?


What make me angry is  say Soul Sacrifice is a Monster Hunter like

Huh what are you talking about it's the same game.

 

I was a fan of MH and no, its absolutely not the same kind of game, this is why i want it .

NOt the same gameplay, not the same goal,  everything is different.

 

Except youre fighting boss with 3 friends ( which is not an invention of MH ), there is nothing to compare.

 

 

Edit : Some people really  believe it unfortunely, they're born with MH.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m