Is Disney buying Lucasfilm really a good thing?

[amp316]

happydolphin said:

amp316 said:

 

Hey amp :)

I don't expect him to be trolling disney too too much since he is a 2.2% shareholder in the company's 2.3 million stocks @50$ a share.

About artistic influence of Disney in the Star Wars film, Disney intends to leverage the current studios of LucasFilm to continue Lucas' creative vision, and Lucas handed the torch to his co-chairman Kathleen Kennedy (I think that's her name), so in the near future (the next 3 films), Disney shouldn't have too much influence on the matter. The exclusion of Lucas takes biggest chunk of the influence on the next movies, and that's undoubtedly positive. If there were any negative from Disney, it would be very little, and in contrast with the good coming from Lucas' departure, it should tally to generally positive quality improvement from the last 3 films.

I actually liked Revenge Of The Sith, so I do I am not 100% positive that these will be better.  Also, there's the problem with what the trilogy is actually going to be.  Is it going to involve Luke, Leia, and Han?  I'm assuming that they would be portrayed by the same actors.  Do we really need to see Luke with a lightsaber in one hand and a walker in the other?  They could do even worse and hire different actors.  Also, if it's just set in the Star Wars universe but later there will be a great disconnect because we won't be familiar with anything.  Also, remember the Black Hole?  Man was that cheesy.

Also, what's going to happen to Indy?