By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Max King of the Wild said:

HA! How can it be an interception if it was not an interception due to the call? Wouldn't it need to be called an interception on the field to be one? Does the player have an interception on his stats after the game? No, he doesnt. I said it was a good call and I stand by that. I also said they missed the interference.

Ruling it a touchdown was the wrong call, it's as simple as that. The NFL reached an agreement with the referees within 48 hours after the game. That makes it pretty clear that the NFL didn't believe in the press release they issued right after the Packers vs. Seahawks game.

But if you stand by your word and still call it a good call, then there isn't any reason for why the Vita doom and gloom callers should retract their calls either.

The fact that you ignore my reasons for saying it's a good call really shows your ignorance. I have perfectly legit reasons to say it was a good catch. While the doom and gloomers were going off a website with a mistake in this particular case.