By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheBardsSong on 29 October 2012
Edit Thread
Bristow9091 said:
TheBardsSong said:
brendude13 said:

Both versions have a poor framerate, it's just an even bigger shame that it is worse on the platform I'm buying it on.

...since when did 40-60FPS become considered a bad framerate? Most console games run at 30. I can guarantee both run a lot smoother than the original did.

I think it's considered a bad framerate when they actually drop below 30FPS, and not far over 30FPS on average, especially the PS3 version, which dropped to 18FPS less than the 360 version during the same scenes...

I've been told the PS3 version is running at a lower framerate than the PS2 version actually... which is very disappointing, but hopefully a patch or something may fix it (Like the Silent Hill HD patch, never played the collection, but apparently it fixed a lot of issues which is nice to know)

I don't remember the 360 version dropping below 30, must have missed that. Still if anything it's well above average. It keeps an average framerate of over 30FPS in both versions, and most games can barely do 30 max without frame drops.