dsgrue3 said:
GameOver22 said:
dsgrue3 said:
chocoloco said:
By the way, the popular vote still shows a lead for Romney. That does not matter as swing state polls are continually favoring Obama.
|
History proves otherwise. Only one time in our history as a country has a President received +3% of the popular vote and lost the election. Samuel J. Tilden - 1876.
|
Why +3 percent? That seems like an arbitrary and cherry-picked number.
|
That's what occurred in 1876. If you disclude that election, no President has received +1% nationally and lost the electoral vote.
|
Yeah, I know that, but a candidate only needs to win +.00001 percent of the vote to win the popular vote. Using +1 is just as arbitrary as using +3. The point is that its perfectly feasible to lose the popular vote and win the election (there's a reason why candidates focus on swing states while ignoring the non-competitive states).
To put bluntly, candidates aren't stupid. They don't try to win the popular vote. They try to win the Electoral College.