| Slimebeast said: You mention the Occupy movement and compare it with the uprising in Syria and question if it is representative of something larger. I do not know much about the Occupy movement but do you imply that the Occupy movement is staged? Now you seem to imply that the uprising in Syria is staged. It is not staged. Of course the Syrian uprising doesn't represent the whole people. Uprisings almost never do. But it represents the Syrians far better than Assad does. I do not like muslim theocracies and how Christians and other minorities are increasingly being forced out of the ME and how these post-Arab Spring nations are becoming increasingly hostile towards Israel. But it's the nature of the region. I don't like this artificial situation where we've had dictators run these countries for so long. Let them show their true colors. Let them be religious societies if they wish. I wish America would invade Saudi-Arabia and put an end to some of the civil wars and genocides in Africa. But that won't happen. But at least America does something while the UN and EU do nothing. I don't deny that America acts upon its selfish interests. I am saying that these interests happen to align with my own interests because I'd rather have America rule the world than a bunch of backwards thinking third world countries, Russia, China and even the EU. |
Don't put words into my mouth. There has to be a point where disgruntled protestors are suddenly classed as the "repsressed" of a government, democratic or otherwise. The occupy movement was to demonstrate the use of corporate money in politics, and how it's being used to influence government decisions. They had everyone against them, including the media and corporate entities, who pressured the mayor of New York to shut down the park that they were demonstrating in for "cleaning". Despite protestors taking ont he task and cleaning the park, they still shut it down. It's exactly the same as riots in Syria. The difference? Government control to silence these groups, whether it's through media, force or any other means.
You're missing the point. America does SOMETHING, but that something is purely agenda-based. Who's to say that the new reigimes in Iraq and Afghanistan are not dictatorial (or turn out to be)? America doesnt care. The only thing they care about is whether the new reigime continues to support them or not. So if you're all for removing dictatorial actions of Saudi Arabia, how about America invades Israel and puts a stop to illegal settlements being built? Oh right, you're all for repression of people that you don't agree with..
