By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GameOver22 said:
gergroy said:
Augen said:
klystron said:

Thank you for reminding people of something Obama would like us all to forget... his two years with a supermajority and getting only health care done. He can't blame the Republicans for an "obstructionist" congress when they had no power. In fact, there has not been a budget passed in Obama's presidency. This is a first. So yeah, you can blame the GOP for the last two years... but in the first two years they did nothing, either.

Just to clarify.  Minority still has fillibuster as mechanism to stop legislation, you need 60 seats in the senate all on the same page to force through bills.  Minority has not been powerless.

They had that until ted kennedy died... That is why it is called a super majority...

The Democrats actually never had a supermajority, unless we're thinking of different elections. The split was 57-41 if you include the independents who caucused with the Dems as Dems.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2008&f=0&off=3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2008

No, the 57 to 41 is without including the independents, who are both actually democrats anyway.  So dems had 59 to 41, then a couple months after the election arlen spectre of pensylvania switched to democrat, giving democrats a super majority.

Edit: i see where you are getting your numbers, after the election there were two disputed seats, minesota that was too close to call, but went democrat, and obamas seat that was appointed by the impeached governor of illinois that was somewhat disputed. Either way, a few months into the term, democrats stood at 60 to 40 seats.