By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
phenom08 said:
pokoko said:

That doesn't make any sense at all.  If you're not talking about the same thing the OP is talking about then you should make your own thread.  Trying to turn it into something else is meaningless.  It's like someone asking which team will be the best in the NFL this year and someone else saying the Dallas Cowboys because they have the highest valued franchise.  Completely different subject.

People keep saying why is Ninty not pushing their own platform? I answered, they are, just not in the way you would like, in other words we may see the next gen games for WiiU next year but not this year because Ninty needs to build a userbase, what game is better at doing that than Mario? We won't see those next gen games this year because the WiiU has a userbase of zero, so no 3rd party company will risk the investment and Ninty would rather have a high selling Mario game day one, than a highly rated Zelda game or whatever else could look pretty on the WiiU.

You know what he meant.  He was talking about the boundries of the hardware from a technical standpoint.  If you had said, "they aren't because they don't need to," then that would have been a perfectly valid, and probably true, answer.  Instead, you gave a defensive and insulting answer that made no sense in the context of the question.

Though I don't like Mario games, I actually agree that they don't need to push the envelope with titles in that franchise.  Still, the way you answered was wrong, and there is absolutely no reason to get upset about anything.