@Ben. This is just a topic. I'm not here to cause argument, I'm here to spur discussion and intelligent thought. I don't understand why you would be hostile to that, honestly.
If Nintendo COULD (BIG IF) have both red and blue ocean, wouldn't you agree that that's the #1 dream goal?
Some are denying it by discrediting the returns the 360 gave Microsoft, which is a cop-out, because as you and squilliam said it is very biased to point the obfuscated EDD losses to the 360 per se. Notice at the end of famousringo's quote (360 platform parenthesis), there is a comma. Lol right? yeah.
So people will say Nintendo doesn't need the red ocean because it isn't profitable, but that is a lie. It was only not as profitable in general this generation because the HD twins went too far (bleeding edge). But my OP and IT posts specifically prescribes a happy, competitive medium.
I really don't understand why things that are so simple to me are so complex for some of you guys. And Ben I didn't expect that last post from you.







