By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:
lilbroex said:
Torillian said:
lilbroex said:
Hynad said:

Ok... so they're saying that it retains the 1080p resolution AND the 60fps... of the consoles versions.
But... somehow, the graphics must still be better... is what you're saying?

¬_¬

No, I'm calling that statement as a whole into question for the simple fact that its stating "both" as being 1080/60 FPS when there are only a handful of 360 games that are native 1080p and they are mostly either 2D or use simple Xbox1 level graphics.

I think that writer was just stating that arbitrarily, because I actually "looked" for the information on the PS3 and 360 versions running at 1080p 60FPS and I found nothing that states this.


But it's the only link from this whole thread that mentions the resolution of the previous versions at all.  For all the links you had not a one mentioned the resolution of the previous versions, just the resolution of the Wii U version most likely because it was included in a press release.  I've looked and I couldn't find anything definitive about the resolution/FPS of the PS360 versions of puddle either, so this is the only evidence we have for one way or the other.


The neogaf link stated it. I posted that on the first page. What makes that link more valid than mine?

The fact that nowhere in the Neogaf report's source, is it mentioned?

And where is Joystiq's source?

I suppose the only way to truly know would be to ask Neko Entertainment.

Neogaf's link of yours is from their forums, not from an actual professional gaming news website. Joystiq's article mentions Neko's QA manager Sébastien Chipot-Delys, and actually provides a quote from him.

You know who to write to now.

Now, if you could be more careful with YOUR reporting in the future, that'd be at least a lesson learned from all this. =P