By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
haxxiy said:
HappySqurriel said:

I suspect this means that the Wii U (probably) is using between 40 and 50 Watts, and looking at it I wouldn't be surprised if the GPU is using 30 Watts. This could mean that the GPU could (at best) perform similar to the Radeon HD 7690M XT (TURKS core, 40nm, 25 Watts)

That would make it nearly twice as powerful as the X360 GPU. Seems spot on from what we've all seen, but the CPU looks like it could be a major bottleneck later on. I'm kind of worried about it. Hopefully they'll pull a F-Zero OK. I'm waiting for it for nine years now...


Looking just a GFLOPS, the Xenos pushed 240 GFLOPS while the Radeon HD 7690M XT pushes 696 GFLOPS, which would be (almost) 3 times as powerful; but still in the range that everyone was (realistically) expecting.

If they used a GPU like this I think it would be a very solid strategy ... When the "XBox 720" and PS4 release the best they could (probably) realistically do as far as GPU performance is in the 2 TFLOPs performance range (roughly 3 times this GPU); anything more than that would result in a system that was (probably) too expensive and produced too much heat. With diminishing returns on graphics technology, even though the Wii U would be much less powerful, this would likely translate into a graphical difference similar to the PS2 to XBox rather than the Wii to HD consoles.

Certainly, it is possible that Sony and Microsoft could produce more powerful systems but I that would require them finding a way to take a GPU from a 175+ watt graphics card and make it work in a tiny console; and I think that is unlikely to happen.