By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
DirtyP2002 said:
well, it makes you wonder if 380 million for a smaller service was a reasonable price.


What do you mean smaller service? Buying Gaikai was a lot better than buying OnLive for Sony.


Why? Why did they need to buy either? Don't they know how the internet works?


Maybe because the way Gaikai works is a lot more suited for Sony's needs? Its actually seen as a very cheap buy. A company with no debt, that uses modular server configurations, was a better choice for Sony that want cloud computing on several devices. OnLive was expensive to run, had fixed server configurations, it was 1:1.