By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
phenom08 on 10 October 2012
Edit Thread
happydolphin said:
phenom08 said

Actually read what I said its pretty clear. I said why does the WiiU need to be extraordinary not the Wii wasn't. Stop seeing what you want to see and accept it doesn't need anything extraordinary(WiiU). The Wii was extraordinary thanks to the software it received, which the WiiU will receive as well but i don't care about why you think the Wii was great. I want to know why the WiiU needs to be that way when plenty of plats have done it without it anything extraordinary.

What he's saying was that the novelty of the Wii caused its sales to propel. What he's saying is that, without said novelty, a successor to the Wii will not have that lift, since it employs the same recipe and thus by definition is not novel.

What you're saying doesn't matter right now. What matters is what he was saying, and what I was saying, since that's what you're putting into question. What you are saying is secondary to that.

Since your opinion is based on a misunderstanding of his opinion, what he was saying needs to be clarified to you, so that you don't misunderstand it.

Well here is the problem, what recipe are they following lol. The problem is you just make stuff up and think we are suppose to just accept it as just an opinion. Saying something false is not an opinion? If you said the sky is red then according to you thats ok because its his opinion lol. No thats just plain false. There is no set recipe lol. If this is  a recipe then why does it follow the same recipe as the Wii instead of the DS( the platform they got the second screen from)? I never missed understood his opinion because its the same bs he has been spewing since the start of the gen. Without the games the Wii would have been nothing, not some motion controller. Im tired of pointing this out the Wii wasn't the first motion controlled gaming device so what exactly is the novelty?