happydolphin on 10 October 2012
| IvorEvilen said: This isn't necessarily just a copywrite infringement claim (which you can't blaim Sony for making the assertion, Bridgestone is clearly trying to cash-in on Jerry Lambert's influence on his fans), but more importantly a breach of contract lawsuit. Jerry Lambert and Bridgestone aren't being blind-sided here. They knew the risks of this shady form of business, and they probably figured Sony wouldn't do anything to avoid bad press, since the media and gamers both seem to respect Jerry Lambert. Sony is setting a precedent, like I would expect Nintendo, Microsoft, Activision, etc., to do as well. Blindly defending Jerry Lambert, with no knowledge of contract or copywrite law (I don't mean just reading things randomly on wikipedia or on websites) just paints you as the fool. The big guy isn't always the bad guy. |
Okay, you need to calm down.
Also, a question for you. How do you prove that Bridgestone is clearly trying to cash-in on Jerry Lambert's influence on his fans? What evidence do you or does anyone have of such an accusation? Answer -> None.
And even if, is that a crime, something to be brought to the legal system? In what way? If you can answer that, you can redeem this post I quoted.
