'That isn't Kevin Butler', Bridgestone claims

[happydolphin]

kowenicki said:

Turkish said:
Yeah, no. Portraying that dude in a videogame commercial is clearly trying to eat from Sony's IP.

Which is of course impossible to prove. He didn't speak and didn't seem to be holding a VP of sarcastic weak humour role.

This is weak and cheap. Grubby and pointless.

QFT. I understand someone trying to defend Sony as a fan, but Jerry Lambert needs to make a living, and works with/is associated with Bridgestone for which he plays a part in commercials. It's his right as an actor to be able to wield a Wii in a commercial if that's what's being promoted, so long as he isn't using an IP created by Sony (Kevin Butler).