Disclaimer: I still haven't finished Brotherhood and haven't played Revelations.
The problem I see with Ubisoft and Desmond is that they have given too much weight to his role in the AssassinsVSTemplars battle without using it, and now they can't go back.
I mean, he is (apparently) the only that has links to the assassins that have were involved with the "apples", and even at the end of AC2 that woman(alien?) at the ends talks to him as the only one who can stop the disaster that is about to happen.
So what Ubisoft has done is create a character that can't be used because if they do, the story will be closer to its end (the defeat of the Templars or at least stopping their masterplan) and they don't want to kill the franchise, but at the same time they can't get rid of him because of how they have written the story.
They have placed themselves in a bad position.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
