man-bear-pig said:
outlawauron said:
Kantor said:
man-bear-pig said:
Bump!
It seems the mods (or maybe it's just kantor, I don't know) have un-done the rule about topless avatars by allowing pezus to have the following avatar:
I enjoy pictures like this as much as the next guy, but I don't want them showing up when I'm on this forum. It'll start an influx of sexual avatars and this site will once again become unusable when I'm in a public place...the NSFW forum is there because it keeps all NSFW material in one place so people know whether or not to visit it when they're in work/school/whatever, but when people have NSFW avatars and are posting in tonnes of different types of threads then the entire forum becomes NSFW.
|
That image isn't topless. Topless (female) avatars are still not allowed.
|
mbr needs to stop be such a prude. There were far racier avatars in years past. I also think he should look up 'topless' as brassiere/courset is not topless.
|
I'm guessing you go on VGChartz using a laptop or desktop? Well I don't, I do 100% of my VGChartz use using my iPhone when I'm out and about, and it's uncomfortable viewing a site when you're with people and you don't know when a topless male (or female) is gonna pop onto the screen. Besides, I'm anything but prudish...anyone who knows me on this site will know that I'm probably one of the least prudish people here, I just don't want to go back to the days when I had to cover my phone when I was on vgchartz because of people thinking its some dodgy dating forum or some shit
|
I browse VGC at work and at home. If there are ever circumstances where avatars/signatures can have racy imagery, then I disable avatars/signatures. VGC is already strict on their avatar policy and there are many forums with 0 restrictions or regulations on it. Consider it nice that it's SFW as is.
