VicViper said:
outlawauron said:
VicViper said:
outlawauron said:
Galvanizer said:
The thing is, Famitsu used to give out only one 40/40 per console. The last console to follow this strict rule was PS2 and the game that got the 40/40 was FFXII. Since the DS, they have changed their scoring policy. Now loads of games can get 40/40 on just one console. have you seen how much 40/40 games there have been in the last 4 years?
That's why I say that FFXII was the last game that really deserved the 40/40. It was the last game judged by Famitsu's harsh scoring policy. |
You really have nothing to back up what you're saying. You like FF12 so it's last one that deserved it?
Famitsu never changed their scoring policy, and they've been averaging 1/year for a while now.
|
1 - They have most likely changed, since scores now are much higher than before ( that nullifies the "never")
2 - Make that 3 per year. Only recent year that scored one perfect is 2012 (Kid Icarus) and the year is not over - pretty sure there will be more.
|
When exactly did they change? Did the standards get more lax in 08 and 09 only to get harsher in 10? After that, they decided to be lax again? This year, they must have gotten tougher to earn, right?
How often do they vary from Western media? They don't. Every game they've given a perfect score to, other publications in the West have as well. That's why I find it funny that people discredit them, but it's mostly because it's the only Japanese publication that we hear about.
|
Read my post again. I changed quite a bit.
|
You say most likely with only saying that they're higher than before. You've been doing comparisons across the line in all genres, across all consoles, over the past 10 years? That would require way to much time and effort, and honestly, you still have low scores given. You even have games that are hyped with lots of advertising still fall short in their reviews.
