It's funny, I keep seeing the same song being sung that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama. That's the biggest load of bs, I keep hearing. It's funny, we supposedly live in a free country, yet we only get really two options, thanks in part to the mentality that we can only have democrats and republicans, who are by in large, do the same crap that keeps, so yes there really is "a dime's difference" that the first response claimed there was. We have both parties, that want to expand the wars, vote for NDAA and the Patriot Act, vote for offshore oil drilling, vote for No-Child Left Behind, and the list does go on. Which is why it really doesn't make a difference to people who actually know the real issues who gets elected between the two.
So yes, those who want to vote Gary Johnson or any other third party candidate should. The undemocratic statist Commission on Presidential Debates openly discriminates against other candidates, which both parties support that policy, so I don't see how how anyone can say either supports open debate lol. Funny how we're supposed to be the "freest" country in the world, yet we don't actually show it a lot of the time. Also note that Mr. Johnson won in a 2:1 democratic state of New Mexico, and managed to leave office with a $1 billion surplus.
If republicans lose, it's their own fault. Funny how they worked so hard to disclude, and alienate the libertarian part of the base with they lack of respect they treated Ron Paul, and are now begging for those votes. If you really wanted someone who could defeat Obama, they should have voted for Dr. Paul, who actually does attract more votes from disenfranchised Democrats and Independents than any of the other candidates.
