Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Bridgestone Americas Inc

[Chark]

Kresnik said:

Max King of the Wild said:
Sigh... didn't bridgestone cut him out? Sony should have appreciated that.

The fact that they have cut him out could well be a sign that Sony did have some kind of contract with the actor which he could be seen of being in breach of by appearing in those Bridgestone commercials.  

Although if that was the case, why they're going after Bridgestone instead of him I do not know.

Seems kinda silly!

That's typical of law suits actually. How much could they gain from one guy compared to from Bridgestone? That is if they are looking for compensation. For an example if someone gets hurt at a university, or is illegally violated in some manner, that person can sue the people directly involved, their boss, all the way to the president of the University, then even the state if it is a public university. The liability is staggering.