|
crissindahouse said: number 1 isn't invalid. 360 owners onw their console much longer as ps3 owners on average and with that they had more time to play through plenty of games. if you think it makes no sense you also say someone who bought a ps3 last week has to have as many games as someone who bought a 360 in 2005. 2. why do you want facts when you have no own facts except a ratio and make a full thread out of it? i mean, that's funny, you have no facts but people have to disprove them with facts, otherwise you just say "no facts" |
1. The 360 only sold ~20m units of software before the PS3 launched. That amount is too minscule to have an effect on tie-ratio in 2012.
2. Can you disprove me or no?
Just saying "you have no facts" doesn't make it true.
My theory stands
