|
TruckOSaurus said: Yeah I agree that my logic didn't work there, half the point scale shouldn't equal half the games but I still think that defining anything below 5 as unplayable crams too much games in the upper echelons. Especially, if a person is rating a game mainly by how much they enjoyed it. |
Makes sense. Unplayable is one category. Then you have cheap games. You know what I mean by that, games that are made with low production value and B teams with lesser talent. It's kinda mean to say, but it's a fact of life. They may work, but they're not really quality games. 5 or less is also good for those. the 3 to 8 range can be reserved for games that are either of low quality but that the reviewer likes (so preference can bump it up), but games that are of high quality that the reviewer didn't like shouldn't be lower than 6 imho.
Essay Pro