Slimebeast said:
This is crazy how you make assumptions. Social democrat assumptions. That's an assumption too. There's ton of people out there who enjoy mugging and beating random victims on the street. Yes, but usually they are drunk. If they actually enjoy making others suffer they do have some sort of issues that needs to be dealt with. Mass murderers like Assad, Khadaffi and Breivik had shitty lives? How do you know that? Breivik is not a sane person. He felt no guilt or whatsoever after killing dozens of youths. Khadaffi severely lacked sympathy and killed some of his own people. If that lack of sympathy was due to having too much money and influence then granting him video games would not be an appropriate way of dealing with his issues. Remember, I said that usually they have shitty lives. If they didn't, you obviousy may need another method than, for instance, video games to stop their abusive behavior. Employers who use slave and child labor for their own profit have shitty lives? It sounds like they live in a shitty country. But no, they don't necessarily have shitty lives. All these people who beat their wife or kid have shitty lives? They sound pretty depressed to me. You don't normally go around and beat up your family because of how much you enjoy life, or use that method to enjoy it even more.
The religious people in Pakistan who sentence rape-victims to stoning have shitty lives? They follow their laws system, which is a completely separate issue. |
Video games is obviously not always an appropriate method of rehabilitating criminals. Where did you get that from?
