the_dengle said:
And you're not looking into this at all. You just assume that EA wouldn't do something that doesn't appear to directly benefit them. Imagine a court case where a man is accused of stealing money from his parents. The prosecution spends loads of time going over his motive, explaining that the son was a drug addict and was ostracized by his parents long ago. While the jury is in deliberation, one of the jurors refuses to accept that the man is guilty, saying, "Why would he steal from his own parents? It doesn't make any sense! Why wouldn't he just ask them for money?" That's you. You're a juror who isn't paying any attention to the evidence or the motive. The accusation simly doesn't make sense to you. Any attempt to explain the situation is dismissed as a "conspiracy theory." |
Unless you have any actual evidence of "wrong doing" on EA's part then it is nothing but conspiracy theroy, that what conspiracy theory is.
