| oniyide said: you're looking way too much into this, how much of a chance did the game REALLY have? Really? How well did you think it would have sold prior to the knowledge of the trilogy? Buying ME3 for Wii U was never worth 60 dollars, period. I dont know how anyone in their right mind could have ever thought that the pricing was far. How well do late ports of games sell at full price most of the time? ME3 for Wii U is a game that simply doesnt make a alot of sense, trilogy or not, if you were a fan of the series you most likely would have bought that game, and even if you hadnt bought it already one would most likely not get that version as it woudl be the most expensive anyway and not really adding that much to the experience. You never answered my question about Ninty only owners. If they only have a Wii U why would the trilogy being released on a systems they dont even have deter them from getting ME3 on Wii U? Or do you believe that most of the people that were going to buy it are now not going to out of...principle??? I doubt. |
What reason do EA have for not releasing the trilogy on Wii U other than having some kind of agenda?
You've been very vocal in the past about how the Wii just couldn't run versions of multiplatform games so it didn't get them, but we know that isn't the issue this time because the Wii U is already running the most recent game in the trilogy.
Disc space/cartridge space is an excuse you've fallen back on to excuse past behaviour in the GC/N64 days, but that isn't a problem now either with the 25GB Wii U discs.
We also have that tweet saying the trilogy is for "new players", and you're saying that ME3 on Wii U would only be for people who haven't experienced the series before (so... new players), put those two concepts together and you have even more reason to put it on Wii U.
So go on, what magical new excuse are you going to think up now, or do we finally listen to Occam's razor...
VGChartz
