By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dgc1808 on 28 September 2012
Edit Thread
Chark said:
Dgc1808 said:
Chark said:
Dgc1808 said:
You could do that... ooooorrrrrrrrrrrr... we could go with EatAVita. :P


I just need to ask....how does EatAVita make any sense whatsoever?


The purpose of the site is the purpose of this thread. A source of information for the Vita. The best praise MUGEN can get for this thread is that someone bought a Vita because of it.  

EatAVita is a play on the double definition of a "consumer", as opposed to the blatant and less comical "GetAVita".


That's quite the stretch and no one will get that. The first reaction will be confusion and there isn't much to work with in the name except to show someone/something eating a vita, or a vita with a bite out of it(probably best use). Either way it is not particularly appealing to the average person, let alone actual Vita fans as the title requires explaination.

The GetAVita alternative is very clashing to the concept of creating a webpage, it is a direct ad line or an imposing statement that won't hit its mark and risks being seen as a desperate reaction to the lackluster sales.

Neither seems to be fiting for the name of a website. Sorry to be so critical but there are bound to be better ideas.


Perhaps, but the name can easily make instance sense depending on how the site is handled. 

Actually, on second thought, I can't see how someone can get confused about the name. The moment you enter, if you see images of a Vita and news articles about new games, then it should just be obvious. Aslong as we don't handle the site completely wrong like treating the site like just a forum (which is what I feel like will happen if we go with VitaChamber), then I can't see the problem with the name. 

And i'm glad we agree on GetAVita. EatAVita sounds like an ad line but it's not as blatant and somewhat... generic as GetAVita.



4 ≈ One