Jay520 said:
For example, imagine two different Franchises: Franchise A and Franchise B. Franchise A releases a new game every year, for 6 years, with each game selling 3million units. That would be six different releases in total. That totals 18 million units for the franchise. On the other hand, Franchise B only releases one game throughout six years. And the game sells 15 million units. Of course, that totals 15 million units for the franchise. Franchise A has sold 18 million units. Franchise B has sold only 15 million units. Using your logic, Franchise A is biggger than Franchise B, and thus, is the bigger "system carrier". But that's not true. Let's look further... The best selling game from Franchise A has only sold 3 million units. Thus, the fanbase of Franchise A is around 3 million units players. Therefore, Franchise A can only "move" about 3 million units, because that's how big it's fanbase is. And to be more lenient for Fanchise A, let's assume there has been some overlapping inconsistencies, so let's bump Franchise A up to 5 million. So Franchise A can only shift 5 million units in hardware. Now look at Franchise B. The best selling game from Franchise B has sold 15 million. Thus, the fanbase of Franchise B is around 15 million units. Therefore, B can move about `5 million units of hardware, because of how big it's fanbase is. So, Franchise A would only shift 4.5 million units of hardware, at best. While Franchise B would shift 8 million units of hardware, at worse. And you would tell me Franchise A is better at carrying a console? You have a stranger definition of "bigger" |
Its the American football is more popular than world football argument that you're dealing it. You make a good point.







