By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
fordy said:

I stopped reading after you mentioned the "you didn't build that" as a gaffe that Obama meant to say. It's obvious to me that you'd take any hit on Obama as totally legitimate, but any hit on Romney is an instant cry of foul. Any sane person who saw that speech IN FULL knows exactly what was being said, and I really think I'm just waisting my time having to argue why including this does not help your position one bit.

We're done here.

I don't think the full speech helps him one bit. His tone was incredibly snide and condescending throughout, particularly the part in the wind up where he said, "You think you're so smart, you think you worked so hard..." What a slappable fuckstick.

Girl, don't go away mad. Girl, just go away. Ta.

One has to look no further for media bias than the death counter.  When Bush was in office, almost every news outlet had a death counter of the total number of troops that had died in Iraq.  Many would pull out one soldier a night and focus on his life before the war.  And when they reached another 1,000 it would be all you heard about.  Where are they now?  Gone, because it would look bad for Obama.  Especially if we focused on Afghanistan, where Obama has been in office for the majority of deaths there.  He's ramped up war spending, as well.

Which leads to another question.  Where are all the protestors of the war? The ones that the new featured almost every night?  I see it as being only 2 real answers.  Either they don't really give a shit about the war and only protested it because Bush was in office, or the media is so biased they aren't covering any protests because it would, again, make Obama look bad.  And I patiently await a Micheal Moore movie blasting the continuing wars.