TheBardsSong on 27 September 2012
@ Zoidberg
I think it's subjective. I find Peace Walker to have a more overall polished look, there aren't nearly as many blurry textures, it (obviously) runs at a higher resolution, AND the bosses are massive in comparison. Environments wise I will admit MGS3D has a lot more to render. The thing that bothers me most is that both games peak performance are 20FPS, and Peace Walker keeps a constant 20 even with massive bosses and explosions on-screen, while MGS3D chugs down to 12-14FPS just from close-ups or having too much grass/trees(which has already been cutback from PS2) on screen. I would blame 3D as the culprit, but it performs just as poorly in 2D.
