oni-link said:
fillet said:
S.Peelman said:
lilbroex said:
superchunk said:
This is not to scale and not representative of actual significance in differences, just a list of least powerful to most.
DS . PS2 . PSP . GC . XBOX . 3DS . Wii . Vita . 360 . PS3 . WiiU
|
DS . PSP. DC . PS2 . XBOX . 3DS . GC . Wii . Vita . 360 . PS3 . WiiU
Fixed
|
GBA . DS . PSP . PS2 . DC . XBOX . GC . Wii . 3DS . Vita . 360 . PS3 . WiiU
Fixed again  .
GBA also belongs in that list by the way, if we're talking 6th/7th/8th Gens. Guess it semi-depends on experience... Or something.
|
Both wrong.
XBOX 1 was more powerful than a Gamecube, Wii and a 3DS.
3DS was more powerful Gamecube, Wii and XBOX.
You guys don't seem to understand raw quntity of RAM and raw speed of CPU doesn't dictate the speed of the console - it's an indicator only. You have the GPU to take into consideration - which is actually much more important.
|
DS. DC. PSP. PS2. GCN. Xbox1. 3DS. Wii. PSV. PS3. X360. Wii U. *
Fixed.
*The PSP is more similar in power to the DC more than the PS2, while the 3DS is more inline with GCN/Xbox1 but with better, more modern shaders thanks to the PICA200. 
http://dmprof.com/english/e_products/e_pica_200/
|
DC is more powerful than the PSP - by a long way.
Ahhhh forget it...
I disgree with you and the posters above who quoted me. I know a thing or two about technical specifications on these things and don't go by "this game looked best". That means nothing, and is down to the developer's ability.
Raw specs. I am right.
Everyone knows for example the PSP was allegedly a PS2....which was actually a load of rubbish and not true at all in reality.
The Gamecube is not as powerful as an Xbox....
You guys smoke too much crack :p and don't read up enough on actual specification and real numbers of GPU throughput.
