Nintendo should copy Sony

[S.T.A.G.E.]

phenom08 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

 

No...technically Sony is for everyone. Theres mature games, sports, casual, platform and all under one brand. No other brand has been that comprehensive since Sega. Like it or not Mario is a casual platformer, Zelda and Metroid are the true standout titles when taking a step up, which is why they dont sell as much as Mario (outside of bundles). Nintendo is commercially more of a family friendly brand. Sony console are generally purchased by teen males to age 40 which means people upgraded to Sony. All Sony needs to do is get a commercial hit of a title and theres always next gen.

Sony has had 3 gens to get a commercial hit, they just aren't as good as you wish they were lol. Ninty covers all of those genres as well but whatever. Ninty's commercial hits are clearly for everyone, what's your point? Ninty's standout titles sell just as much as Sony's. Zelda Twilight has sold more than every franchise made by Sony accept Gran Turismo, so what makes Ninty only family friendly? Teens to 40 year olds, 40 year olds don't play Sony games, they are playing Wiisports with their family and Wiifit. When are you even going to show me a single ounce of proof of what you believe? I remember seeing surveys with the Wii leading the way with children and adults over 35. Why are their no PS3's in nursing homes? Ofcourse you ignored that. This time reply with some factual evidence, instead of your beliefs.

What are you talking about? Crash Bandicoot and Spyro were created under Sony. They were both commercial hits that could've been built upon but were sold to Activision. There are no PS3s in nursing homes because they are for gaming? Nintendo and Microsoft are have provided a their consoles as a target source of casual experience. Sony has the least casual experience on the PS3. The PS2 had it and so did the PSX. Singstar is over the 20 million mark as well.