phenom08 said:
Sal.Paradise said:
phenom08 said:
Sal.Paradise said:
Yes! You already brought this up! This is a different thread!
And I already posted: "I will gladly do that in the other thread. Kameo is still a significant and noticeable generational leap over original xbox games."
So go there to post to avoid confusion with this one, and tomorrow I will gladly compare last gen games to Kameo on 360 with you! THANKS.
|
How am I suppose to go to another thread you haven't even told me the title of? What confusion lol, you aren't confused you just can't accept I busted you on picking the wrong Xbox game to compare Kameo to. You are just trying to dodge me lol.
|
" How am I suppose to go to another thread you haven't even told me the title of? "
In your own post:
"This is all from page 3 of the "Next Gen Launch Games" thread."
Tada!
But since you're trying your very best to get one over me, I'll stay here for now, it seems to be a trend. Both those photos, of Kameo on the 360 and original xbox, I found on a post on Neogaf, and thought they were a great comparison. That's because they were both games with the same art style, same character model etc, and so no one could argue 'oh but the art style is different, it's cartoony and saturated but (for instance) half life on the xbox is realistic, so its not a proper comparison!' as I have seen others do. It is much easier to demonstrate that difference in capability when the games use exactly the same art style, hence why my comparison in that thread, I felt was so useful (and the OP agreed).
It was not an attmept to decieve, by painting the Kameo on the original xbox as if it was the best looking game on the system. I'm sorry if it came off that way!
I already explained this briefly in this thread, but you ignored:
"Kameo! it llustrated the massive jump in quality at launch, but with the benefit of having the same character designs/ art style so people couldn't bitch about them being different or Kameo not counting because it was cartoony/oversaturated (an argument I've seen posted before to wriggle out of those comparisons.) "
|
1. How would I know you even posted in that thread lol. So Fail.
2. In your word. "That's because they were both games with the same art style, same character model etc, and so no one could argue 'oh but the art style is different"
So his comparison of Gun on Xbox and 360 are more valid since its FINISHED product vs. FINISHED product lol. So Fail again! You knew what you were doing, you cherry picked Kameo to prove a point you couldn't. You were caught plain and simple. Deal with it.
|
1. What?? How would you know? Because you brought up that I did post those two kameo pictures in that other thread! so you must have seen it! You yourself just cited that post: "you posted in the next gen launch thread" so you obviously saw it! What the hell man :/
2. Ok. Again, I thought i was just confused but I was completely right, you STILL misunderstand what i was doing in here. God damn, phenom.
I'm making this extremely clear for you.
My issue with him posting the GUN picture was not how he compared it to the one on the older consoles.
My issue is he was trying to paint the whole 360 launch line up as looking bad, by using that screenshot.
It is misrepresentative of the 360 launch lineup.
Because much better looking games launched alongside the 360. Such as kameo, which I believe is the best looking 360 launch game, hence why I would use screens of it in this thread.
That is why I brought it up. Nothing in that discussion is in reference to, or talking about, the previous gen versions of GUN or Kameo.
That is it. You have to understand by now, surely.
I'm sure anybody reading this can understand. Maybe you don't want to because you want to get one up on me. Well, whatever your motive is, there it is explained clear as day for anyone to see. So simple.
