By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chocoloco on 21 September 2012
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
insomniac17 said:

I voted in the poll for the first option (7,5,3,2,1). I think it's unlikely for the same person to take the top few spots every week, and this point distribution allows more players to earn points. Then, if there's a group of people who score in the top 5 regularly, we could end up with a relatively close distribution of points among a larger number of players which I think would make the later part of the league more interesting.

As for reminders... I suppose you could ask if they even want to keep participating or not. It doesn't matter too much though, if you don't mind just recording a 0-16 week for those players. 

That's what I wanted to hear. That's why you got hired. I also saw that you picked Cleveland this week, so you are truly trying to make worse predictions than me.

I am going to make this change, unless there's a huge outcry against it in the next couple of days. The top 5 will get points each week and the home field advantage formula will be adjusted. Should make the prediction league bigger, better and more badass.

Also, I am going to send a PM to the lazy bastards tomorrow. In order to keep things consistent for the season, reminders will be sent only to people who run the risk of missing two weeks in a row.

Do not like system at all when it only rewards the top pickers. The only thing it encourages is skipping weeks and still winning because a skipped week is worth as much as not placing high. I did not even care about the rule rumblings until I see you are serious. This sounds too complicated and arbitrary.