Andrespetmonkey said:
The PS3 was expensive not because it used a GPU from 2006, but because it used a blu-ray drive and CELL processor. If the PS3 used a similar CPU to the 360 and DVD drive it would of been just as powerful and $200 cheaper. I actually don't even need to speculate here, just look at the Xbox 360. If anything it's only marginally less powerful than the PS3, but it launched at $300-400 a year earlier. |
Cell's loss was in R & D, the chip itself was pretty cheap and didn't really drive up the cost of the PS3. The RSX was actually about 40 dollars more expensive than Cell.








