happydolphin on 19 September 2012
| Jay520 said:
Your argument is weak because it's completely dependent upon your subjective definition of sacred union. Using your logic, I could define 'sacred union' as 'two humans in love'. Which would mean that homosexual marriage falls under the category of 'sacred union'. Therefore, I could make the argument that homosexual marriage is not a step towards beastiality, and it would be just as valid as your argument. |
You could, and you do. The only difference between you and I is that you pretend to be objective, while I do not. I'm basing my judgement on my personal values, which are subjective, as do you.
