By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
DarkThanatos said:
the2real4mafol said:
DarkThanatos said:
I'm referring to the factcheckers that are reported over here in the UK.
Where as a general rule we are unbiased towards American elections :P

I'm not so sure this time, not after Romney said we were not ready to host the olympics (just before the olympics) and yet we hosted one of the best olympics ever. That really pissed off our media and some of us. We are America's closest ally, and yet if Romney became president he would just write us off like that, on a regular basis. Our government don't criticise theirs, so a potential presidential candidate should not be saying stuff like that. 


Even so, our news broadcasting (BBC) is up there with the least corrupt/biased out there. Even though Romney is unpopular in the UK because he is a complete tool- the news would still report the facts. 

Not really... and definitly not when talking about US politics.

The BBC is very pro-statist, anti-spending and willing to show heavy bias as soon as anything that effects them might pass.

As can be seen by their huge swing against the conservatives as soon as it became aparrent they were for trimming the BBC budget a little bit.

I dont think it is Very pro-statist. 

Admittedly they are slightly left, but they still report the facts as they are and dont outright lie to the bset of my knowledge. 





So hyped for Rome 2: Total War