pokoko said: Then make a thread about those things. This is why any discussion about politics always gives me a headache. The focus can never be about something a politician has done wrong. It always turns into "uh, well, that thing the other guy did was worse!" It's just pointless. |
This is a thread about those things. And precisely what is wrong with his statement? Do 47% of households not receive some sort of payment from the government? The Census Bureau says it's actually 49%. Is that a good thing? Why is Romney's suggestion that perhaps people who are receiving a check from the government aren't inclined to be sympathetic to the idea that the government should be writing fewer checks somehow scandalous?