Jay520 said:
Player1x3 said:
Except that proof is only possible in mathematics. Nothing in science relies on proof either, just evidence. These 2 are different. So asking to prove God is dumb (as well as asking to disprove)
|
Well of course nothing can be proven. Like you said, it's all about evidence. I thought that goes without saying. Most people don't really stress over the definition of the word so long as both parties understand each other. By saying 'proof,' most people know that we just mean sufficient supporting evidence, without the need for clarifying. But I guess if you really want to get strict with semantics, then fine: Present sufficient evidents that supports the existence of God as a justified belief.
Besides, DeRav was the one who said he had 'proof' of God, in the first place. I'm just asking for whatever he says he has.
|
It's dumb to seek evidence for irrational beliefs such as theism and atheism
