crissindahouse said:
"nitpicking" said the guy from the the last of us pax demo thread searching for every small thing which wasn't perfect... and no, i don't try to do that, i just want to buy a wii u and i would prefer one with a hdd in the console even if i would have to pay 50 bucks more for a 250gb hdd console or so instead of hiding a hdd anywhere behind anything. and i wouldn't need flash memory for that. i would be totally fine to get what i already have in two other consoles and my hdd i will have to use now for the wii u is also no flash memory so why do you think the 250gb drive had to be one then? and that's obviously only what i would prefer and would like to see, not what i say nintendo should have done for everyone, for me it would be better, maybe for most it wouldn't. btw it still stands that i can buy a 250gb new for 50 bucks (just check amazon as example, 50 for 250gb and 58 for 320gb) or even less for the 360 and don't have to buy a 120gb refurbished for that price. that's what you said to compare it with "120gb sata for 20 bucks" and there is a little difference between 120gb refurbished for 50 bucks or 250gb new for 50 bucks. it's still more expensive like i already said but that makes it double the gb for the same price and new instead of refurbished, i would say that makes at least 50% difference to what you said first^^ and i didn't want to make more out of it as it reall yis, i just wanted to say that you can get it way cheaper as you said and that i would prefer a hdd, not more and it was nothing against nintendo or whatever. |
I can get a 1tb drive for 70 dollars. A 320gb new xbox drive is around 60 dollars. How is that not insanely overpriced? I paid 50 for my 750GB desktop drive a year ago and 50 for my 500gb 2 years ago. So you're saying I should have to pay the same price for half th espace? Also the 250gb in the Wii-U would have to be nand due to the way the console was designed. There is no place for a physical drive. That's why.







