happydolphin on 14 September 2012
| Teflon02 said: You can't call this childish. This maybe seem like a bunch of babies on the outside, but actually LISTEN to what the point is. People have been asking for a Bayonetta 2 for a while and the first game, it was a multiplatform game for PS3 and 360. So obviously even if exclusive the game could have atleast been 360 or PS3 exclusive. Hell if it was a portable game for PS Vita, this would be more valid, cause sometimes they make portable games for a series which are exclusive. But a game like Bayonetta... Did you guys even play it? Who in there right mind would buy a Nintendo console expecting to play Bayonetta. Smh, these devs are forgetting how these games do on the Wii The Wii had the same treatment at first with a bunch of sequels to ps2 and so on. Then when people start to see the other consoles fight back they all think mario, mario. Just like 3ds. They try but 3rd party just isn't nintendos thing. Wii U doesn't look bad by any means to me and I'm going to get on launch if i have enough preordered by the day. But I and many can't support non-sense. SEGA games I like in general and so on, hell I have EVERY Sonic game available on PS3 with 100% but Sonic CD which is like 40 cause I don't like it |
It's up to 3rd party devs to make the system be about more than just mario mario. Also, do you realize Nintendo is sponsoring the game?? Maybe they couldn't make the games without that support, did that enter your mind?
So Nintendo sucks is quite a disrespectful insult to Nintendo who is actually making this game happen. So fans of it should stfu and say "thank you Nintendo".
It was worse when Square went from making the FF games Nintendo exclusive for 6 big games to Sony exclusive, because Nintendo and Square were actually allies, Nintendo supporting rare with dev effort and if I'm not mistaken even money, but you never saw shit like in OP.
