By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Corey said:


With your claim to fallout 3's superiority your only mentioning minor changes and faults, not the big scope that makes RPG'g great, such as story, characters and setting. New Vegas is superior for having a big branching story incorporating many factions and quests all over the wasteland that effect the final battle and ending and doesn't just have a singular straight line, the quests are interesting and have multiple ways of finishing and progressing through them. There are more memorable personalities in New Vegas and the setting offers a more intriguing setting with a great range of locations.

New Vegas also fits in with Fallout Lore a lot better than F3, linking up and referencing events in the previous games often, whilst F3 brought back the previously wiped out organisation of the enclave and introduced a BoS who acted nothing like the BoS to have a clean cut "good guys vs bad guys".

Whatever you think is better I reccomend to play at least 100 hours of NV (that's what it takes) before making a final decision.

I agree, Fallout New Vegas had a far better story than Fallout 3 did. F3 was super generic typical American style Apocolyptic story. New Vegas tried something a lot different and I found it to be a total success. 



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)