| selnor said:
Nokia though has an F/2.0 camera (more light for the sensor, more ‘bokeh’ blur), 1/3” BSI sensor and optical-image stabilization (OIS) with that last one being a first for a smartphone. Toss in Nokia’s algorithms plus Scalado’s software and in terms of raw specs, Nokia crushed Apple. Yes, we need to do side-by-side comparison, but any photographer worth their salt would reach for the Nokia’s PureView camera over the iPhone 5 just based on specs. http://www.wpcentral.com/iphone5-versus-lumia-920
|
ROFL, LOL and LMFAO.
Any photographer worth their salt doesn't give a toss about the camera on their phone, because they reach for their digital SLR. Or if they're really dedicated to their craft they do it the old fashioned way with actual film.
I think the pissing contests over the quality of camera on phones is laughable. The only really important thing with phone cameras is lag time between puching the button and capturing the image. That's it.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
